A design system is a set of guidelines, best practices, principles, and a library of design solutions that help designers tackle common design challenges. The main goal is to streamline and standardize the design-to-development process, ensuring consistency across different platforms and interfaces, such as web applications, mobile apps, and wearables.
Design systems also play a significant role in maintaining brand consistency. Visual consistency is like a language that communicates your brand’s identity without using words. By following the established components, patterns, and styles in the design system, designers can create a cohesive brand voice, regardless of how many people are involved in the product’s creation.
Let’s take Spotify as an example. Their user interface is easily recognizable across all devices, from mobile apps to desktop versions. This is because of their robust design system, which ensures consistent typography, color schemes, and component behaviors.
Design systems go beyond just rules and rigidity. They encourage collaboration between designers and developers. Designers provide visual guidelines and aesthetics, while developers bring those visions to life through functional coded components.
This highlights the interconnected relationship between design and development within this ecosystem. Together, they create products that are both aesthetically pleasing and functionally robust.
However, as products grow and evolve, design systems face the challenge of accommodating these changes while maintaining consistency. The concern is that every added component and nuance adds another layer of complexity. This is the scale-consistency dilemma in design systems.
A design system’s main goal is to provide a consistent design language. However, as it grows, inconsistencies can arise. Without careful review, these inconsistencies can multiply and create disjointed user experiences, which goes against the very essence of a design system.
To illustrate, let’s take a look at Apple’s iOS. Over the last ten years, Apple has introduced countless features, aesthetic changes, and functional updates. However, they’ve always made sure to keep the simplicity and intuitiveness of iOS that users love intact.
As Jony Ive, the former Chief Design Officer of Apple, said, “We try to develop products in a complex world.” It’s no small task to maintain consistency in such a vast and complicated design ecosystem like iOS. Apple’s ability to do so showcases the need for meticulous attention when balancing scale with consistency.
Spotify has introduced Encore, a framework that consolidates its existing design systems. At the heart of Encore is the Encore Foundation, which focuses on foundational design elements such as color, typography, and motion. On top of this, there are systems like Encore Web and Encore Mobile, followed by specific local design systems for particular products or audiences.
This shift is significant because Spotify recognizes the need for a design system that respects its culture of autonomy and vast product landscape. Rather than having a single, rigid design, Spotify has embraced a flexible, collaborative, and interconnected system of systems that can adapt to the company’s dynamic needs.
There is often a debate surrounding the impact of design systems on creativity. Critics argue that design systems, with their structured components and guidelines, can act as barriers to creativity. However, limitations can be powerful catalysts for innovation, as seen with the sonnet in poetry and Apple’s iOS in design. A robust design system can channel creativity in directions that ensure innovation and consistency.
However, there are times when a design system can feel too rigid, hindering creativity. In such cases, a designer may need to make a crucial decision.
The Role of Design Systems in Simplifying Developers’ Jobs
In the fast-paced digital landscape of today, the need for products that are efficient, consistent, and of high quality is constantly growing. This is where design systems come in as a strategic partner for developers.
Why Design Systems Matter to Developers
A well-organized design system serves as a guide for developers, making their work more efficient. Instead of creating components from scratch, they can rely on a toolkit that ensures consistency and high quality.
However, things can become complicated if the design system is neglected or too extensive. In such cases, developers may struggle to find the right component or come across outdated guidelines, leading to delays in development.
Additionally, while design systems are meant to simplify the work of developers, they can also raise the question of whether they stifle creativity in favor of efficiency.
A design system should be viewed as a tool rather than a strict set of principles. Although it provides structure, it is important to recognize that innovations and deviations from the norm may be necessary. It is up to the team to determine when to follow established practices and when to explore new approaches.
Creating design systems is beneficial, but it also presents challenges. Achieving a balance between scalability and consistency, while still allowing for creativity within limitations, is easier said than done. Nevertheless, by prioritizing clear communication, consistent updates, and a user-focused approach, design systems can revolutionize frontend development. It’s important to keep in mind that design systems are meant to be tools, not restraints. They should serve as a guide, not a hindrance. As we move forward, let’s embrace the potential of design systems while staying mindful of their purpose.